The Southern Poverty Law Center is accused of manufacturing the extremism it purports to oppose

The US Justice Department has charged the anti-racist Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) with wire fraud over its funneling of more than $3 million to white supremacist and extremist groups, including the organizers of the deadly 'Unite the Right' Charlottesville rally in 2017.

In an indictment handed down by a grand jury in Alabama on Tuesday, the SPLC was charged with 11 counts of wire fraud, false statements to a federally insured bank, and conspiracy to commit money laundering. According to the Justice Department and the FBI, the organization misled donors by soliciting money to "fight" extremists, then covertly funneling the money to the leaders of these same extremist groups.

Given the SPLC's stated mission of "fighting white supremacy and various forms of injustice to help create a multiracial democracy," the indictment - if proven - reveals stunning hypocrisy at the heart of the organization.

What is the SPLC?

Founded as a civil rights law firm in 1971, the SPLC has grown into one of the US' leading liberal NGOs. It has won civil lawsuits for victims of Ku Klux Klan (KKK) violence, agitated for immigrant, LGBT, and prisoners' rights, and its database of "hate" organizations is considered authoritative by mainstream media outlets.

Throughout the 1980s and 1990s, the SPLC focused its attention on white-supremacist and Klan-adjacent groups, one of which firebombed the organization's Alabama offices in 1983. The SPLC's more recent activities have proven controversial: the organization was accused of anti-white racism when a senior staffer, Mark Potok, was filmed with a 'countdown clock' to whites becoming a minority in the US taped to his desk; and the SPLC's listing of Charlie Kirk's Turning Point USA as a "case study" in "hate and extremism" led the FBI to cut its ties with the center after Kirk's assassination last year.

What does the SPLC indictment allege?

width="560"

height="315"

src="https://mf.b37mrtl.ru/files/2026.04/69ea006e85f540719e09a7c9.mp4" frameborder="0"

>

According to the indictment, donors were told that their money would be used to help "dismantle" the extremist groups listed in the SPLC's database. What they weren't told was that this money was actually being funneled to these groups via fictitious business entities, and that the SPLC would in some cases order the groups to continue stoking racial hatred. The list of recipients includes:

• A member of the online chat group that planned the 'Unite the Right' rally in Charlottesville - $270,000 between 2015 and 2023

• An affiliate of the neo-Nazi National Alliance - $1,000,000 between 2014 and 2023

• The Imperial Wizard of the United Klans of America - unknown amount

• An officer in the Aryan Nations-affiliated Sadistic Souls Motorcycle Club - $300,000 between 2014 and 2020

• The Chairman of the National Alliance - $140,000 between 2016 and 2023

• The leader of the National Socialist Party of America - $70,000 between 2014 and 2016

• The National President of American Front - $19,000 between 2016 and 2019

• The wife of an Exalted Cyclops of the Ku Kluk Klan - $3,500 at an unknown time

Two of these individuals - the National Alliance chairman and National Socialist Party of America leader - were listed by name on the SPLC's "extremist file" web page at the time of the payments. The president of American Front was, at the time, a convicted felon over his taking part in a cross burning.

Another individual was allegedly paid $160,000 by the SPLC, which he then disbursed "to various violent extremist group leaders including the former Grand Wizard of the Knights of the Ku Klux Klan," the indictment alleges.

Did the SPLC secretly organize the Charlottesville rally?

Protesters hold torches and chant at the 'Unite the Right' rally in Charlottesville, Virginia, August 11, 2017

Getty Images; Samuel Corum

A 2017 torchlit march attended by hundreds of right-wingers, militia members, 'alt-right' activists and white supremacists in Charlottesville, Virginia, ended in tragedy when participant James Alex Fields rammed his car into a crowd of left-wing protesters, killing one person and injuring 35.

Democrats and the mainstream media tied President Donald Trump to the spectacle. Trump, who expressed support for some of the participants, spent the remainder of his first term in office repeatedly disavowing "the neo-Nazis and the white nationalists, because they should be condemned totally."

Some of Trump's supporters maintained that the SPLC was behind the rally, although their claims were dismissed as "conspiracy theories" by the media. Right-wing influencer Alex Jones was sued for defamation when he claimed at the time that the rally was a "false flag" operation organized by the SPLC in order to demonize the right.

According to the indictment, however, a man described as "a member of the online leadership chat group that planned" the rally and attended the event "at the direction of the SPLC... made racist postings under the supervision of the SPLC, and helped coordinate transportation to the event for several attendees."

The SPLC has never denied planting informants within extremist groups. In this case, however, it appears that the center played a leading role in organizing the rally - one which it concealed from the media, law enforcement authorities, and its own donors.

Is the SPLC's use of informants illegal?

The SPLC's use of paid informants is not illegal, provided the informants are not being paid to commit crimes. What the lawsuit alleges is that the SPLC knowingly deceived its donors, who were told that their money would be used to "dismantle" extremism and "uplift progressive candidates who uphold inclusive democratic values," and knowingly deceived banks, who had no idea that fictitious companies with names like 'Rare Books Warehouse' and 'Fox Photography' were fronts for funding extremism.

Nonprofits like the SPLC are not required by law to show donors where every dollar of their money was spent. To win the case, the Justice Department will need to prove that the SPLC engaged in a deliberate scheme to lie.

How has the SPLC responded to the indictment?

In a statement on Tuesday, SPLC CEO Bryan Fair said that the organization no longer uses paid informants, but that the practice helped the SPLC infiltrate extremist groups and "saved lives."

width="560"

height="315"

src="https://mf.b37mrtl.ru/files/2026.04/69e90032203027665c22c902.mp4" frameborder="0"

>

"We are outraged by the false allegations levied against SPLC," Fair said. "Today the federal government has been weaponized to dismantle the rights of our nation's most vulnerable people and any organization like ours that stands in the breach," he continued, adding: "we will vigorously defend ourselves, our staff, and our work."

What is the government saying?

The SPLC "lied to their donors, vowing to dismantle violent extremist groups, and actually turned around and paid the leaders of these very extremist groups," FBI Director Kash Patel said at a press conference on Tuesday. The organization "was not dismantling the groups," US Attorney General Todd Blanche added. "It was instead manufacturing the extremism it purports to oppose by paying sources to stoke racial hatred."

width="560"

height="315"

src="https://mf.b37mrtl.ru/files/2026.04/69e8fcfd20302762a45be7e2.mp4" frameborder="0"

>

Responding to Fair's allegations of "weaponization," Blanche told Fox News host Laura Ingraham that the "indictment is free for everybody to read, and if the takeaway is that that's political, I mean, I think the opposite is true." The SPLC's conduct, he said, was "extraordinarily egregious."

(RT.com)